So Google Analytics isn't the perfect creature you always thought it was? If you've been using Google's service for long enough, you might understand that while Analytics is the giant in the room, there is enough space left for other providers.
Problems with Google Analytics include the inability to see data live (or even on the same day), lack of raw conversion data, true time (eg. Universal Time), ability to add notes, share goals between profiles or switch profiles while maintaining context (switching takes you back to the dashboard). Google's Analytics program also lacks social media metrics and doesn't let you see traffic spikes by source easily - althought there are a number of plugins and Greasemonkey scripts that help extend that functionality. The latest news is that Google are now writing extensions to allow users to opt-out of analytics, whatever browse they're using. However, sometimes a cohesive approach works better, so you might want to investigate some of the alternative providers.
Here's our pick of the bunch - don't forget you can use as many as you like (at the same time if it helps) as you fill gaps in your site metrics.
ChartbeatOne of the big let-downs of Google Analytics is that it only allows you to see yesterday's data. This is fine if you've got a low volume site, but a bad thing if you've got an established web presence, as there's no way of seeing the immediate impact of changes made to your site.
Chartbeat fixes this while also providing simple information dashboards - appealing to those who haven't got over their love affair with classic cars. A regular criticism of Chartbeat is that it lacks features, but we looked deeper and found it worth every cent of the US$10/month it'll cost most site owners to use.
Chartbeat offers a free trial of their software for a short period, and are then priced at ten dollars a month thereafter, which is quite competitive considering their offering.
The software comprises of two main dashboards – the real time user information and historical data ones, alongside a raft of killer features:
There's also a Chartbeat iPhone app, so if you have access to the App Store you'll be able to see what your site is doing while you're on holiday (or just away from the computer). While not killer feature for everyone, it's certainly killer if you count yourself among the 45 million people who own an iPhone!
Negatives are the Twitter brand monitoring, which while useful could have provided more compelling insights and extended to other social media, and the "concurrent users" pricing model which isn't always easy to translate to a real website. These are fairly small gripes however, when most sites will fit into the standard plan, and plans above this should be affordable to any users with the traffic to need them.
learn more at http://chartbeat.com/

We're big fans of AWStats - we've installed it on over 200 sites, but we're not afraid to admit it's major shortcomings. It's ugly - it hasn't seen a major visual overhaul in nearly 10 years, and it also requires a fair amount of technical knowledge. At the very least, you need to know how to install Perl, know the absolute paths (path to the file on the server's operating system) of your website logs, and to be willing to spend an hour or so tinkering with notepad + ftp. Ideally, you'll have administrator access to the server your site is on, and understand logging settings.
That sounds like a pretty large downside, but the upside is equally large. This isn't one of your Web 2.0, "we've got nice clothes" statistics packages, but one that looks at the raw data generated by your webserver's logging functionality. This gives you the truest picture we've come across of any statistics program - visitors can't opt out of asking you if they can see a webpage.
Killer features include:
Missing features include anything which the Javascript, 'on-site' or API-based statistics packages get from interacting with your users - no social media insights, no live usage information (unless you parse your log-files very regularly), and a lot of important information needs you to put in the effort to create a custom report - for instance, you can't see which of your Australian visitors are using Windows 7 and Internet Explorer 8 out of the box. All in all though, for pure statistics and simple graphing AWStats can't be beaten.
learn more at http://awstats.sourceforge.net/
MintMint has been around for a while - just a little bit longer than the product we're comparing it to. The $30 per site license and requirement for PHP & MySQL (plus another technical install) will put off a lot of users, but it has garnered a lot of respect for it's visual design and extensibility. Some of the things we love about it:
As you can see from the list above, the main beef with Mint is the lack of features built into the core functionality. While modular content and extensibility are a good thing, the default installation is light-weight to say the least. Mint's display feels less 'snappy' than that of it's competitors, often showing you a circular loading icon when you want to be looking at content. Peppers are a great way of providing functionality (although at the expense of speed), yet you'll want double the list above to feel really happy with the data you receive.
learn more at http://www.haveamint.com/ or visit the live demo.
ReinvigorateReinvigorate is a new offering from MediaTemple which is currently in beta and well worth watching. We're not 100% sure how it'll pan out at the moment, but it's worth a look for the following features:
We found the curve overlays on traffic reports very useful for management-level reporting, but there were a few concerns with the product. One is the significant stakeholding from MediaTemple, a company known for time it takes to get a response from their support department. We're hoping this won't be the case with this product.
learn more at http://www.reinvigorate.net/
WoopraWoopra's logo epitomises everything bad about Web 2.0 branding. The name says nothing about the service, the gradient (vertical) + drop shadow (2px deep, 135 degree angle) + font (Trebuchet MS) scream out "generic" and "lightweight". The mask/lidded eyes of the two O's imply that data is hidden from view, and it's difficult to spell. So it's worth putting aside branding prejudice when looking at this surprisingly useful stats package.
Killer features include:
Things which could be improved start off with the plan selection and pricing. The Bronze plan @ USD$4.95/month is reasonable value, but the number of page views is very limiting and only having 6 months of data stored is shocking. This goes up to 3 years when looking at the Titanium and Kyptonite plans, but by then you're paying USD$1000 or more per annum. Although there are understandable issues with storing the massive amount of data that site logs generate, for this price you'd expect more, especially as Woopra could allow you to download your data to the desktop app they want you to use, if the problem is to ease load on their servers. We see more it as a nasty plan migration option. We're not too happy that the free plan only stores 13 weeks of data and no SSL support (making it useless to a large number of online shop checkouts, members areas etc). This makes it harder to evaluate the service. However, looking deeper into the 'Ads: Yes: part of that pricing plan makes it clear Woopra won't put ads on your website, and that seems fair.
In summary, Woopra is developed by ex-Google engineers and the quality of the interface shows. The flip side is that it has only been out of beta 6 months, and looks very pricey over three years compared with other options.
learn more at http://www.woopra.com
Google Analytics alongside Chartbeat and AWStats seems to be the right approach for the majority of data-centric users, while for a $30 one-off fee, adding Mint and a whole lot of Peppers seems a no-brainer for anyone on an Apache server with a PHP website. In the course of this post, we also began to evaluate Clicky again, which will be covered in detail soon. We've got high hopes for it following it's movement to a CDN (Content Delivery Network) and a raft of new features, but with downtime last year (August, September, October 2009), the removal of the Twitter Followers feature (Jan 2010) and a failed micropayment service (Contenture, May 2009) to it's name, it has a lot of credibility to catch up on.